Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - OliverC

Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10] 11 12
136
Interesting Play Hands / Thinking Defence
« on: July 24, 2017, 10:45:11 PM »
I hate to harp on about counting the hand (well actually I don't, because it's the single most important thing in Bridge, literally) but here is a really good example where Opps completely (1) failed to grasp the importance of good signalling, (2) failed to grasp what was going on on this hand, and (3) was guilty of now counting his tricks.


You are East (NS Vulnerable) and Opps (Brian Meadows and me) are playing the Complex version of OCP and have bid to 3 !D on the following sequence:


South     West      North      East
1 !D        No           1 !H (1)     2 !C
2 !D (2)    3 !C         3 !D         All Pass

(1) 8-10 HCP any shape
(2) 5+ Diamonds

Partner leads the 7 !C and you can see


                      Dummy
                      !S 542
                      !H AJ764
                      !D K87
                      !C J10
You
 !S AK10
 !H KQ10
 !D 94
 !C AQ842

You take the Ace of Clubs and return the Queen, which is won by Declarer's King (Partner plays the 9). Declarer now draws 3 rounds of trumps ending in hand. For some reason you discard the !S 10 on the 3rd round (maybe requesting a Spade, but perhaps upside down suit preference for a Club). Declarer ducks a Heart to your 10 (Partner plays the 8 ), you play the !C 8 and Declarer ruffs and ducks another Heart to your King (Partner plays the 9). How do you play?

It might seem attractive to force out Declarer's last trump with another Club, on the basis that Partner's 8 and then 9 of Hearts suggests they have 3 Hearts (which means Declarer hasn't got any more), but (1) this flies completely against any logic (why would Declarer abandon the A !H in Dummy) and (2) You completely missing the point about this hand if you do that. Consider:

Declarer definitely started with 5 Diamonds and 2 Clubs and has already played 2 Hearts. They can only have a maximum of 3 Hearts, which means they must have 3 Spades (4 if they only have 2 Hearts). You have already won 3 tricks, so the AK !S must be cashing to take them 1 off. The big danger if you plod on with Clubs is that if Declarer has 3 Hearts, he can now ruff and run 3 Heart tricks to make his contract.

East fumbled the ball here by continuing with Clubs, allowing Brian to bring home his "impossible" 3 !D contract.  in fact, if East had discarded a small Club on the 3rd Diamond, EW can actually cash three Spade tricks to take this contract -2. On the first Heart, it's important for Partner to play the 9 rather than the 9. You can immediately tell that  Partner has an even number of Hearts (a doubleton for certain) and you can immediately abandon the idea of forcing Declarer in Clubs in favour of cashing your Spade tricks before they disappear.

137
Interesting Play Hands / Re: Preposterous Contracts!
« on: July 23, 2017, 10:47:22 AM »
You're absolutely right, John. It isn't really ambiguous, for the reasons you outlined above, but it is potentially ambiguous (because the system doesn't actually define what 4 !C is here), which gives rise to the worry that Partner might intend it as Beta (you have, after all, shown a maximum hand with long strong Diamonds), which in turn means they might have misinterpreted your subsequent 4 !D bid.

138
Interesting Play Hands / Re: Catering for good defence
« on: July 23, 2017, 10:42:52 AM »
Very nice, Jimmy, but at heart I'm a fairly uncomplicated guy. Looking for complicated solutions, when there is a simple  solution that is 100% guaranteed to obtain the number of tricks you need, is not my style.

139
Interesting Play Hands / Great Defence
« on: July 22, 2017, 10:01:44 PM »
Eszter defended really well on this hand earlier today: Opps are in a contract of 5 !D (The bidding went 1 !D - 5 !D ). They're not vulnerable and you are, and you have led the 4 !S and this is what you can see:

Dummy
 !S 72
 !H 54
 !D A965
 !C AQJ105
                   You
                   !S Q10643
                   !H AQ86
                   !D J842
                   !C -

On the opening trick, Declarer took my Jack of Spades with their Ace, and led the Queen of Diamonds which held the trick, Partner (me) contributing the 10. Declarer erred badly, by continuing with a small Diamond to Dummy's Ace, on which I discarded the 10 !H (the main purpose of which was to convey to Eszter that I didn't have a Heart honour - The Spade position was fairly clear, since Eszter wouldn't underlead the Ace, and I certainly didn't want to suggest a Club).

Declarer now took the King of Spades and ruffed a Spade in Dummy. Now a 3rd round of Diamonds to Declarer's King left your Jack the boss trump. Declarer now led a Club to Dummy's Ace and a Club back to their King, on which Eszter discarded 2 Hearts. A third Club followed and Eszter still didn't ruff. Only on the 4th round of Clubs did she ruff, knowing that Declarer was now cut off from the all-important 5th Club in Dummy, because he'd started out with !S AKx, !H ??, !D KQ73, !C Kxxx. Eszter now exited with the Queen of Spades and Declarer was endplayed. If they ruffed, she then had to lead away from !H Kx and if they discarded a Heart, Eszter could simply cash the Ace of Hearts for the setting trick.

Note that even if she was unsure exactly how many Clubs Declarer had started with, it's completely safe for Eszter to wait until the 4th round before ruffing. Declarer is known to have started with 3 Spades and 4 Diamonds. If they only started with 3 Clubs, then they must have 3-card Hearts and can only discard one of those 3 cards on the 4th Club. If they only started with 2 Clubs, then they must have 4-card Hearts. If they started with 4 Clubs, then they only have 2 Hearts, but never get the opportunity to discard anything if you ruff the 4th Club. Ruffing too early is fatal, however, if Declarer still has a Club left in their hand. You can take your Jack of Diamonds, but Declarer will always be able to discard all but one of their Hearts on the long Clubs if you don't cash the Ace first.

No question, Declarer completely stuffed this contract, which is cold for 11 tricks. With KQ73 opposite A9xx in the Diamond suit, consider the possibilities: If the Diamonds are 3-2 it makes no difference how you play the suit. If South has J108x, there's nothing you can do. What you can cater for, especially when RHO drops the 10 on the first round of the suit, is LHO having started with J8xx. So the next card must be the King, because when RHO shows out on the second trick, you're in a position to take the marked finesse on the 3rd round.

If it wasn't for the 4-1 !D break, of course, the hand is cold for 12 tricks in Diamonds, but nobody got to 6 !D . Nearly half of the field were in 3NT making anything between 9 and 12 tricks. The only Pairs in slam were one pair in 6NT-1 and one in 6 !C -1 (6 !C is no good, because the !S ruff doesn't gain you an extra trick)

140
Interesting Play Hands / Razor Thin
« on: July 22, 2017, 08:09:45 PM »
OCP is a fairly aggressive system, and aims to get us to thin games based on fit. Today Eszter and I landed in a game that was positively anorexic! LOL This turned out to be a very interesting hand from a play perspective:

North
 !S A874
 !H A1032
 !D 7
 !C K1086

South
 !S J1052
 !H K865
 !D QJ104
 !C A

Love All, Dealer North (No opposition bidding)

1 !D  -  1 !H
2 !H  -  2NT(1)
4 !H - All Pass

(1) Long-suit trial bid in Spades

West led the 4 of Clubs. I played low from Dummy and took East's Queen with my Ace. Prospects did not look too good. I've at least 1 inescapable loser in Spades, Hearts and Diamonds (and that's if the suits split), but I will be lucky to escape a second loser in Spades because I am missing the 9 as well as the KQ, so if West has H9x I'm probably doomed. Clubs are probably not a problem, because if West leads another I'll try the 10, butgetting West to lead one might be tricky.

In an attempt to persuade Opps to do me a favour, I led the Diamond Queen at trick 2 (hoping to persuade them I was desperate to ruff Diamonds), which was taken by East's King. The favour I was looking for duly appeared when East returned the Jack of Hearts. I won with my King and then finessed the 10 in Dummy, on which East played the 4. So far so good (I've escaped a Heart loser).

Now I ruffed the 8 of Clubs in my hand (East following with the 5 and West with the 2) and tried the ruffing finesse in Diamonds, throwing Dummy's 10 !C . No luck, West played the 3 and East won with the Ace and then returned the !D 2. How do you play?

At some tables East had overcalled Diamonds. Had that happened I would undoubtedly have played the 4, but without that information I went up with the 10 and West ruffed with the Queen (and I won the trick with Dummy's Ace).

The situation is now

 !S A874
 !H 3
 !D -
 !C K

 !S J1052
 !H 8
 !D 4
 !C -

Not a single Spade has been played. East is known to have started with !H Jx, !D AKxxxx, and !C Qx. West originally led the 4 !C and has subsequently played the 2 and is known to have started with !H Qxx, and !D xx. How do you continue?

.
.
.

I decided that I was going to play West for both Spade honours, on the basis that East has already showed up with 10 HCP and if they had started with either or both of the Spade honours, would probably have overcalled at some stage with a nice 6-card Diamond suit. It's unlikely I can win this if West has KQ9, but if East had !S 9x, I can pin the 9. First I cashed the King of Clubs, discarding the Diamond from my hand (not a Spade, because I want to endplay Opps). I think this is a better move than discarding a Spade, because my plan was always to lead a small Spade from Dummy towards the J10xx in my hand.

This caters for KQx with West, but if, by some chance, East had Hx, especially Kx, it's very unlikely they would play low. In fact, when I played a small Spade from Dummy, East played the 9,
and my 10 was taken my West's Queen, which was perfect. West now had to lead another Spade or give me a ruff 'n' sluff in Clubs. He chose the latter, and I ruffed in hand, discarding a Spade in Dummy, and West then covered my Jack of Spades with the King and Dummy was "high".

Making 4 !H was moderately successful. Most of the field were in part-scores. Only 2 other pairs were in 4 !H and one of those went off.


The thing about this hand is that sometimes you have to wait and try to find out more about the opposing hands before committing yourself irrevocably to one particular line of play or another. Here Spades was always the critical suit. I could have led the Jack of Spades earlier, but I would have been doomed to fail if West had started with Q9x. Similarly I hadn't the information to place the majority of the Spades with West or the point that West was more likely to have the King and Queen, because East hadn't overcalled his strong 6-card Diamonds, until West ruffed the 3rd round of Diamonds. Everything up till that point was trying to find ways to save a trick (as in Heart) in case the Spade position was unfavourable and I had to lose 2 tricks there.

141
Interesting Play Hands / Preposterous Contracts!
« on: July 21, 2017, 09:08:21 PM »
Sometimes, even with OCP, you hit a sequence which might be ambiguous with a significant affect on the subsequent bidding. Imagine you are South (North was Eszter)


South
 !S AK
 !H Q
 !D KQ987643
 !C Q9


After some reflection you decide on a 1 !D Opening rather than 1 !C (and yes, I did give 1 !C some serious thought) and with no opposition bidding, the bidding proceeds


1 !D - 1 !H
3 !D - 4 !C (1)
4 !D (2) - 5 !D
??

(1) Does Partner think this is Beta? It is ambiguous, but I think it ought to be natural rather than Beta, hence my bid of 4 !D .
(2) Does Partner think this is showing 0-2 Controls or just saying I have a huge Diamond suit and no support for Hearts or Clubs? Is their subsequent 5 !D a sign-off, disappointed with my apparent lack of controls?

I tanked for quite a while while I considered my options here. In the end I decided (especially given that Eszter often tends to be in the wimpish side of aggressive) that I would rather be hung for going off in 6 than playing a cold 6 in a mere game, and bid 6 !D .

West (my hero) led the 2 !D and Eszter put down

North
 !S 93
 !H AK652
 !D 10
 !C K7532

South
 !S AK
 !H Q
 !D KQ987643
 !C Q9

East won the Ace of Diamonds and returned the Jack of Spades. I won, and cashed 2 more Diamonds, discarding 2 small Clubs from Dummy, West discarding a Spade and a Club. Now what?

Yes, you could just concede a Club to West's Ace [it's fairly clear they probably have that, because if East had had it, it might have been impossible for them to resist (a) Doubling and (b) trying to cash the A !C at trick 2]. You can see that with East having started with !D AJx, unless you were prepared  to run the 10 !D on the first round of the suit, even 5 !D is normally not going to be making, so you're only going -1 in 6 !D , when 5 !D -1 is probably the "normal" result. I decided to play my luck, though:

If West had 5-card Hearts and the Ace of Clubs, I can squeeze him out of his Heart trick. Also, the fact that Opps don't know I only have 2 Spades might put additional pressure on them.

I therefore  cashed the King of Spades and then ran all of my Diamonds, throwing 2 Hearts from Dummy and then all of Dummy's remaining Clubs. Opps both discarded 2 Hearts on the first 4 of those 5 Diamonds, and, amazingly, both discarded Hearts on the last Diamond, which meant that 6 of the 7 outstanding Hearts had now been chucked. I was now down to !H AK6 opposite !H Q, !C Q9, and took the last 3 tricks in Dummy for 15 IMPs.

6 Pairs were going off in 5 !D , and almost all of the rest were in making Diamond part-scores. One Pair had made 5 !D on the lead of the 2 !D by West but that was the only other pair making a game, let alone a slam.

Lucky? Yes, insanely lucky, but...

After trick 2, you might as well play as I did. If the worst comes to the worst and Opps keep all of their Hearts, one of your Club losers will disappear on the  K !H so you will still come to the same 11 tricks that the opening lead has gifted you. You might as well play for a mistake from Opps. My possible squeeze position never materialised, but the secondary position did, in that West felt he had to keep hold of the Q !S and A10 !C , and East felt he had to hand onto the 108 !S , which meant that neither of them could hold onto 3 Hearts and were presumably hoping that I was void in Hearts and had no hope of reaching Dummy's AK6.

 :)

142
Interesting Play Hands / Re: Catering for good defence
« on: July 21, 2017, 08:27:07 PM »
Ahhh. You're changing your tune a little now. You originally said you'd play the hand similar to Samet (who started the Clubs with a small Club from Dummy, rather than the QUEEN) :) That is slightly different. I concede you will still make your 9 tricks, but there is absolutely a zero chance of the Diamonds being 4-4 here, given the 2 !D overcall

143
Interesting Play Hands / Re: Catering for good defence
« on: July 21, 2017, 05:41:26 PM »
Jimmy of course there is, in the sense that you're committing yourself to relinquishing any and all control of the Diamond suit regardless of how the suit is splitting. If the defender with 7-card Diamonds also has the Ace of Clubs and a Spade of any sort, then you're down, because when they win the Club/Spade you're eventually going to have to exit with they're going to have 5 tricks to cash. All you will have made is 4 Diamonds, 3 Hearts and a Club. They'll have up to 3 Diamonds and up to 3 Spade tricks.


On the lead of the 7 !H, I think I take a second Heart, and then start on the Clubs. It doesn't matter what Opps do, they cannot stop me from taking 4 Clubs, 2 Hearts and 3 Diamonds.

144
Interesting Play Hands / Re: Catering for good defence
« on: July 21, 2017, 08:32:21 AM »
That's not too bad, Jimmy, as long as you are in hand when the defence duck the second Club. If you're in Dummy (as Samet was) you have no ability to cash any Diamonds, because you're no entries left back to hand. Moreover, you need to cash only two Diamonds, not 3, because you don't know at that stage who has the Ace of Clubs. Cashing a 4th Diamond brings you down to a singleton Spade in Dummy and now when you concede a Club, the defence might be in a position to cash 2 Diamonds and 2 Spades.


Seriously, given the 2 !D overcall by East missing all 4 top honours in the suit,  is it conceivable that they have less than a 5 or 6-card suit? Would you really overcall vulnerable on !D 10xxx when RHO has made a 2/1 response? :)


As I said before, your duty as Declarer at any form of IMP scoring is to play 100% safe for the contract you're in rather than trying for overtricks. Suppose West started with !S AKQx, !H -, !D 10xxxxx, !C Axx. On your line, you're cashing all your Diamonds (again what are you going to discard from Dummy on the last Diamond?), before exiting with the Club. If you chuck a Spade, I'll take my Ace of Clubs, two long Diamonds and 2 Spade tricks. If you chuck a top Heart, you're giving up any chance for your overtrick right away. It's a million miles safer to establish your Spade trick first, then cross back to hand to the Jack of Clubs. If nobody takes the Ace, cash only 2 Diamonds, throwing losing Hearts from Dummy, and now play a second Club. On this line you are absolutely 100% for 9 tricks whether Opps take the second Club or not, because you've already established your 9th trick in the Spade suit.


No Trump technique 101 is to establish tricks before cashing easy winners elsewhere. Here the reason for cashing 2 Diamonds (and only two Diamonds), is solely to remove Dummy's losing Hearts so that the line of defence East chose is not open to them. Cashing a 4th Diamond trick (and the 3rd !D will show the Diamonds are 6-2 even if you hadn't anticipated that probability from the bidding) gains you nothing, gives up your control of the Diamond suit, and gives you an awkward discard from Dummy. No point.

145
Interesting Play Hands / Re: Getting Slam Hands wrong!
« on: July 21, 2017, 08:01:29 AM »
Hi All,


Yes Eszter could have passed 4 !H as Relay Beta, but remember that South is a semi-balanced minimum and she knows we're missing a Club honour it's perfectly fine that she signs off. Any impetus for slam has to come from my side of the table. It's a bit like the hand I reported on yesterday: Sometimes with a minimum it's better to sign off without using Beta (which sends a message) and allows Responder to use their judgement (as here).

146
Interesting Play Hands / Re: Catering for good defence
« on: July 20, 2017, 08:23:41 PM »
Absolutely right, John. Playing for an overtrick when the basic contract is in doubt is a fool's game at IMP scoring. The rule for IMPs is utterly to play safe for your contract before you start trying anything cute. The only time that might not apply is when barometer scores are level going into the last board of a TM, when you're effectively down to Board-a-Match scoring. Now you might take risks for an overtrick, but never at cross-imped Pairs.


Here, whether or not you establish the Spade trick first or not, it's lunacy NOT to take 2 top Diamonds to get rid of Dummy's losing Hearts before playing a second Club.

147
Interesting Play Hands / Catering for good defence
« on: July 20, 2017, 01:19:07 PM »
This was a very instructive hand that I played with Samet (doru77) this morning and it's all about making and reassessing your "plan" for the hand. Game All, Dealer South. You are North and the bidding goes as follows:


South       West        North        East
1 !H          No            2 !C          2 !D
No            No            2NT(1)      No
3 !C(2)      No           3NT           All Pass

(1) Lebensohl
(2) Forced

West leads the Ace of Spades, and this is what you can see:

South (Dummy)
!S 10972
!H AKQ43
!D J
!C Q75

North
!S 854
!H 8
!D AKQ5
!C KJ964

West cashes the AK of Spades (East following with the 6 and then the Jack) and then switches to the 10 !D, won with Dummy's Jack. How should you plan the play? This looks like a simple contract, in that you have loads of potential winners, no suit is threatened and you only have 4 probable losers, but the hand is deceptive and needs careful handling:

.
.
.

(1) Tricks: 4 Diamonds, 3 Hearts, up to 4 Clubs and even a Spade trick, so no lack of winners.
(2) Losers: 3 Spades and the Ace of Clubs
(3) Potential Problems: No immediate ones, but your singleton Heart might restrict your access to Dummy.
(4) Plan: Threefold:
  • Establish my Spade trick immediately
  • Having done that play a small Club to K or J in my hand
  • Depending on what Opps lead when they take the Q !S, play off 2 of my 3 Diamond winners, discarding Dummy's losing Hearts, before playing a second round of Clubs

Samet didn't think this one through. He started on the Clubs immediately playing a Club to his King and a second Club to Dummy's Queen, but that second Club did him in, because West played well and ducked. When Samet played a 3rd Club, West could take his Ace of Clubs, cash the Q !S, and exit with a Heart, trapping Declarer in Dummy to concede 2 Heart tricks at the end

The full hand:

                     South (Dummy)
                     !S 10972
                     !H AKQ43
                     !D J
                     !C Q75
East                                   West
!S AK3                                 !S QJ6
!H 76                                   !H J10952
!D 1087632                          !D 94
!C 103                                  !C A82
                     North
                     !S 854
                     !H 8
                     !D AKQ5
                     !C KJ964
If, having already established his Spade trick, Declarer cashes 2 Diamonds, leaving one in reserve to "hold" the suit and discards Dummy's 2 losing Hearts, he's now absolutely bombproof because
  • Dummy will effectively be "high"
  • There's no benefit to West to hold up the Ace of Clubs

Moral
Even the simplest looking hands often have hidden pitfalls. Always make a plan and spend a little time covering the "what if?" situations

148
Interesting Play Hands / Going for the obvious
« on: July 18, 2017, 10:24:48 PM »
This was a good example hand that came up today while I was playing with OktayA: You are South, Game All, Dealer West. West opens 2 !S which is passed round to you. You try your luck with 3 !H and this is passed out

North
 !S K3
 !H J84
 !D K10854
 !C Q84

South
 !S QJ2
 !H A9753
 !D AJ73
 !C 7

West leads the !D 2. You play low from Dummy and capture East's 9 with your Jack. Plan the play...

.
.
.

You can see that you've landed on your feet here, in that 2!S is probably going to make fairly comfortably. You just have to make your contract. Losers: 1 Spade, 1 Club, and probably 2 Hearts. No problems there. Tricks: 5 Diamonds, 2 Spades, and hopefully 3 Hearts. Dangers: Clearly there is a Diamond ruff in the offing which is not quite such a problem if it's the hand with 3 or more trumps that's ruffing, because they'll probably be ruffing with a natural trump trick, but it'll definitely cost you the contract if it's the hand with shorter trumps that is ruffing. Options: If Spades are 6-2 you might be able to get across to Dummy safely to lead the K !H , possibly pinning the singleton 10 in West's hand, but that is a fairly fanciful distribution to play for.

Why look for exotic solutions when by far the most sensible thing is just to play for a 3-2 trump break? Bang down the Ace of Hearts and lead a second Heart towards the Jack. This assures you of 9 tricks whenever the trumps are 3-2. Moreover, the opening lead looks and feels like a singleton, which makes a singleton Heart with West more unlikely.

The full hand:

                       North
                       !S K3
                       !H J84
                       !D K10854
                       !C Q84
West                                     East
 !S A1098765                        !S 4
 !H Q6                                  !H K102
 !D 2                                     !D Q96
 !C K32                                 !C AJ10965
                       South
                       !S QJ2
                       !H A9753
                       !D AJ73
                       !C 7

At our table (Oktay was West and I was East), the luckless Declarer didn't follow the common-sense approach. At trick 2 he led the Queen of Spades. Oktay hopped up with the Ace and returned a Spade, which I ruffed. I now led the 6 !D (a Club through the Q84 would have been nice since by now it was probable that Oktay was 7213 shape). Oktay ruffed and returned a 3rd Spade ruffed in Dummy with the Jack and overruffed by my King. The Ace of Clubs and a 3rd Diamond ruffed by Oktay's !H Q gave us 6 tricks for +200 and a nice 2½ IMP gain.

When you can see Opps are likely to start ruffing, then unless an alternative strategy is obvious, it often pays to forget about subtle plays such as finesses and just go for the quickest method of divesting Opps of their trumps. The probability of a 3-2 split in Hearts is nearly 70%. Why look further? If the trumps are 4-1 the likelyhood is that you're going to be down however you play the hand. Here you can afford to lose two trump tricks so best to just go ahead and lose them as quickly as possible

149
Interesting Play Hands / Super defence
« on: July 17, 2017, 06:34:13 PM »
Samet and I combined well on the following hand, but most of the glory belongs to Samet. You are North in the following auction at Game All:

Bidding
West       North         East       South
No           1 !D (1)        1 !H       1NT(2)
No           No               2 !H       No
No           X               All Pass

(1) Nebulous Precision 1 !D
(2) 8-10 balanced

Partner leads the Ace of Spades against this contract and you can see

                        Dummy
                        !S J8743
                        !H 843
                        !D J2
                        !C J76
North
!S K652
!H Q
!D Q983
!C AK83

The Ace of Spades is followed by the 10 and Declarer's Queen falls under your King. What now?
Samet switched to the Queen of Hearts. Partner won Declarer's King with the Ace and switched again to the 10 !D, covered in Dummy, covered by your Queen and taken by Declarer's King. I think Declarer panicked a little at this poiunt, because he now played King and a small Heart, perhaps fearing a second-round Diamond ruff in my hand. I too my Heart 10 and continued Diamonds, my 7 being taken by Declarer's Ace. Instead of drawing my last trump, Declarer tried the Queen of Clubs, but Samet was equal to the task: He won with the King, cashed his winning Diamonds, cashed the Ace of Clubs and exited with his 2 !S, promoting my !H 7 as our 8th trick for +1100, which was worth a whopping 14 IMPs.

If Samet had played a Spade at trick 3 for me to ruff, Declarer has an easy loser-on-loser play and simply discards a losing Club. Switching to a Heart instead was a great play. Declarer can still do better by trying for a Diamond ruff in Dummy, but he's always in trouble by that point.

On a part-score hand where most NS Pairs are making +120, even going for -200 is going to be a poor result for EW (One enthusiastic NS Pair bid and made 3NT thanks to some appalling defence, but that was the only other score above +200 for NS and several were recording minus scores in Spade or NT contracts). Sometimes you have to trust Opps' bidding and go quietly, even when you have a 15-count

150
Interesting Play Hands / Making the most of it
« on: July 17, 2017, 06:22:07 PM »
Played an interesting Teams Match with Samet (doru77) earlier today. After 2 Boards we were 26 (yes, twenty-six) IMPs to the good, helped along by the following hand -(hands rotated for ease of viewing)

Hand 1
Samet played this one very well, but we were booked for a great Board here whatever happened, as it turned out.

North
 !S 8653
 !H 82
 !D KJ
 !C Q9864

South
 !S AKQJ92
 !H 1065
 !D 96
 !C K5

Bidding
East        South        West       North
No             1 !S          2 !H        2 !S
No             3 !S          X            All Pass

West led the King of Hearts, overtaken by East's Ace and a small Heart back to West's Queen. The Jack of Hearts now followed. Samet did well, ruffing with Dummy's 8. A Club to his King and West's Ace followed and all West could think of was to take their Ace of Diamonds. Ruffing high in Dummy seems like an obvious thing to do, but it's surprising how often Declarer's forget to do it and then wring their hands when East overruffs with the 7. If East holds the 10, there's nothing to be done, but why not give yourself that extra chance?

In practice, our team members were bidding and making 5 !H on this Board at the other table, so even -100 would have been a good result here, but +530 was the icing on the cake and the lions share of the 14 IMPs we clocked up on the Board.

Hand 2
You are South at Green vs Red, Dealer North.

North
 !S KQ62
 !H 9862
 !D A
 !C KJ96

South
 !S 8743
 !H -
 !D Q7432
 !C AQ52


Bidding
North       East      South      West
1 !D (1)      No         1 !S         2 !H
2 !S           4 !H       4 !S         X
All Pass

I should perhaps explain that West doubled 4 !S in a nanosecond. If BBO would permit him to double "in a voice of thunder" I dare say he would have :) . The lead was the Queen of Hearts, overtaken by East's Ace and ruffed in hand. How do you plan the play?

The other table was in an identical contract via a similar sequence, and the opening lead was a Heart there too. Maybe Declarer there didn't pick up the vibes I did. At trick 2 he played a Spade to the Queen. Now the Ace of Diamonds, a Heart ruffed in hand, Diamond ruffed in Dummy, another Heart ruff, then the Ace of Clubs and a Club to the King. 8 tricks so far, but I suspect Declarer hadn't fully forseen the end position.

North
 !S K6
 !H 9
 !D -
 !C J9

South
 !S -
 !H -
 !D Q74
 !C Q5

Declarer now led a Club, but West, with AJ10 of Spades and J10 of Hearts was able to ruff, Cash the Ace of Spades and lead a Heart, forcing out Declarer's last trump and so he had to concede the last two tricks for one down.

At the other table, I played for West to have !S AJ109 right from the start and didn't draw any rounds of trumps. My expectation was that West would have 4522 shape. That would give East a singleton Spade, 4-card Heart support and 5 Diamonds, which I thought was consistent with the bidding. My plan was always to ruff all of Dummy's Hearts, take 2 top Clubs and the Ace of Diamonds as entries to Dummy, ruff 1 Diamond in Dummy and then exit in Clubs.

After ruffing the opening Heart, I crossed with a small Club to the Jack, ruffed a Heart, a Club to the King (West didn't ruff (phew!)), Heart ruff, Diamond to the Ace, Heart ruff, and lastly a Diamond ruff. At this stage I've also made 8 tricks, but see the difference:

North
 !S KQ6
 !H -
 !D -
 !C J9


South
 !S -
 !H -
 !D Q74
 !C AQ

Now West is in a hopeless position when I lead a Club. West, with !S AJ105 and the last Heart, is forced to ruff. If he cashes the A !S , my KQ are top, and if he leads the last Heart I ruff high and exit again with my last Club. North is now endplayed again by his own trumps to win and lead away from the Ace. In practice West tried the lead of the 10 !S , but I won with the Queen, and was still able to endplay West with my last Club, which he was forced to ruff.

The critical thing here was (1) to determine not to draw even a single round of trumps, (2) to ruff 4 Hearts in hand and (3) to take 2 top Clubs and the Ace of Diamonds while I was ruffing the Hearts. and only to go for a Diamond ruff in Dummy once all of that had been accomplished. Once West followed to the first two Clubs and East to all 4 Heart tricks, I knew I was home.

Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10] 11 12